As a major fan of this series, I wanted to bring this point up, a controversy that has long plagued the Lyrical Nanoha fandom...
The StrikerS story arc. It was drastically different than both of the initial two seasons. Was it of high quality, or does it suffer from Dragonball Syndrome? Did it continue an already seemingly complete series past a point that it should not have superceded, or did it genuinely expand upon the Lyrical Nanoha canon? Did it seem like an attempt to milk the franchise's concepts, or was the change of pace a welcoming breath of fresh air? Is it fine as is, or should it have been done differently? Given the choice, what would you have done to make it different?
Basically, what I'm asking is... did you like season 3 or no? This is a debate. You are more than encouraged to defend, oppose, or remain indifferent, and go into elaborate detail explaining why.
Warning. Keep in mind that, although this is a debate, and a debate is an argument, it is an organized, intelligent, and above all friendly argument, whose purpose is to discuss and analyze the subject at hand, allowing all members in participation to be enlightened about the topic and to learn of the people who share their interests. It is a social activity, and you are participating with very real people with very real feelings. Be civil, be polite, be considerate of your statements and actions, and above all respect your fellow members. As usual, all forum rules are to be enforced, and failure to cooperate will result in the necessary countermeasures being taken by our administrative and moderation team.
Also take advantage of the spoiler tags in the appropriate situations. Series newcomers, be warned.
Have at it!
