Topic: Final Fantasy Series (Read 129958 times)

Adarian · « **Reply #100 on:** September 28 2005, 05:47 am »

Yeah, I agree completely. FFX-2 had very good gameplay but just not a sufficiently developed story.

And I guess the difficulty of Final Fantasy is dependent on how good of a gamer you are. You're pretty good if you can beat FF games fairly easy. It usually takes me a few weeks to complete a FF game, and I had to use a strategy guide to beat Tactics, so I guess I'm not that good at RPGs.

monkey · « **Reply #101 on:** September 28 2005, 06:00 am »

i loved FFX2 where if you kept finding the spheres you find out more about the backstory, its well worth the time playing it.

I'm pretty good at RPGs like Final Fantasy and Kingdom Hearts, I can complete them in a few days but give me a RP game like Strategy where you use a cursor and i'll fall defeat to everyone.

theres certain games i kick *** at and some i suck at, like i love my RPGs, Dance games, Fighting Games and Tactical Games.
i'm not so good at FPS and Strategy (liek C&C) but they are really fun to play anyway.

Saiyuki · « **Reply #102 on:** September 28 2005, 06:59 am »

Actually, i don't play a lot, but i like to try and do everything, so beating it will take a while...but usually you can beat anything by summoning constantly.

I can't wait to test out the ffxii battle system! I hope it's a challenge but not brain nummingly hard.

monkey · « **Reply #103 on:** September 28 2005, 07:04 am »

i actually almost never summon, i'm a big fan of fighting hand to hand combat

snowangel · « **Reply #104 on:** September 28 2005, 07:06 am »

All time favorite has to go to FFVI hand down. Great storyline, great character development, good replay value. It'd be awesome if Square Enix does a new version of this with the technology they have now ... but alast I hightly doubt it'll happen.

Be interesting to see how FFXII does. I didn't even bother to play FFXI.

Saiyuki · « **Reply #105 on:** September 28 2005, 07:42 am »

@vexnet: hand-to-hand combat takes too long for me, i don't really find battles fun so i like to finish it quick.

@snowangel: ffvi is great! I really think that this ff really deserves to be remade again!

monkey · « **Reply #106 on:** September 28 2005, 07:44 am »

i think 6-9 need to be remade but thats just me!

i like the longer battles because thats just how i am ^^; haha i guess i really am a good DBZ fans (the long fights are better, lol)

Tooya_Mizuki · « **Reply #107 on:** September 29 2005, 03:21 pm »

Same here, I like longer battles as well, i'm a fighter

. Also love DBZ too, one of the best anime of all time!.

Adarian · « **Reply #108 on:** September 29 2005, 03:53 pm »

FF6 was a good game, probably one of the first games of the series to really establish FF as one of the greatest RPG series.

And as for battle length, I think it depends on the battle system. I prefer more of an adventure style battle system like .hack and some of the Zelda games had because long battles there are usually fun, but if it's turn-based, it eventually gets somewhat repetitive, and it can get boring if the battle's too long.

monkey · « **Reply #109 on:** September 30 2005, 01:18 am »

Quote from: Adarian on September 29 2005, 03:53 pm

And as for battle length, I think it depends on the battle system. I prefer more of an adventure style battle system like .hack and some of the Zelda games had because long battles there are usually fun, but if it's turn-based, it eventually gets somewhat repetitive, and it can get boring if the battle's too long.

that is why FFXII is moroe like Kingdom Hearts, that battle system was awesome.

Alexiel · « **Reply #110 on:** September 30 2005, 02:46 am »

FFX2 was fun ni its own wa. Many say this sequel wasn't really... great. But whatever, it was fun nonetheless.

Quote from: Adarian on September 29 2005, 03:53 pm

And as for battle length, I think it depends on the battle system. I prefer more of an adventure style battle system like .hack and some of the Zelda games had because long battles there are usually fun, but if it's turn-based, it eventually gets somewhat repetitive, and it can get boring if the battle's too long.

Lol, turn based batlle systems are for strategic purposes as Active Time Battle is for... well, speed? I forgot where I read this off of but that what I remember. I like both styles depending on the situation. As for the new one Square is making for FFXII, I liked what i've read so far. So I have expectations as a gamer for it. ^_^

monkey · « **Reply #111 on:** September 30 2005, 02:52 am »

lol, yeah that is right,

Quote from: Angelic-Essence on September 30 2005, 02:46 am

Lol, turn based batlle systems are for strategic purposes as Active Time Battle is for Speed

i wonder what the story twists are gonna be this time.. ooh i cannot wait for it!! AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Tooya_Mizuki · « **Reply #112 on:** September 30 2005, 03:45 am »

Quote from: VexNet on September 30 2005, 02:52 am

lol, yeah that is right,
i wonder what the story twists are gonna be this time.. ooh i cannot wait for it!! AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Same here, im dyin for its release. I'm also interested in FFXI which I think was the online version of the game, though theres no provider for the game yet in my country, so the only way to play it is through international means, which is expensive

.

monkey · « **Reply #113 on:** September 30 2005, 04:37 am »

i just won't get it because if i'm going to play agame online i demand it to be free. i'm not paying, no way.

Tooya_Mizuki · « **Reply #114 on:** September 30 2005, 04:40 am »

Quote from: VexNet on September 30 2005, 04:37 am

i just won't get it because if i'm going to play agame online i demand it to be free. i'm not paying, no way.

Wish it was free too,i've already wasted a lot of money from playing Ragnarok Online, it was fun though.

Saiyuki · « **Reply #115 on:** September 30 2005, 05:45 am »

Quote from: VexNet on September 30 2005, 01:18 am

that is why FFXII is moroe like Kingdom Hearts, that battle system was awesome.

Actually, the battle system isn't going to be like kingdom hearts, it will be brand spanking new (i think) but still kind of resemble the online play of ffxi (i think since i've don't play online games).

monkey · « **Reply #116 on:** September 30 2005, 07:25 am »

Quote from: Saiyuki on September 30 2005, 05:45 am

Actually, the battle system isn't going to be like kingdom hearts, it will be brand spanking new (i think) but still kind of resemble the online play of ffxi (i think since i've don't play online games).

no... it resembles more that of Kingdom Hearts than Final Fantasy...

Saiyuki · « **Reply #117 on:** September 30 2005, 09:06 am »

Well this is where i got my info:

http://ffxii.net/?nav=game/battlesys
http://www.ffxiionline.com/main.php?ffxii=4

monkey · « **Reply #118 on:** September 30 2005, 09:40 am »

yes, that is more similar to Kingdom Hearts than the other Final Fantasys, I know because as i quote from them "its more like Final Fantsy XI and Vagrant Story" both are also similiar to Kingdom Hearts.

also looking at the pictures helps support what i said.

Saiyuki · « **Reply #119 on:** October 01 2005, 05:43 am »

Yeah, but it resembles ffxi, a final fantasy!

I'm pretty sure it's not that much like kh, well, it will be sort of like it but only slightly. There is a lot more going on in this battle system. Like you can switch battle party leaders, the gambit system, and developing differently depending on how you train them.

News:

AuthorTopic: Final Fantasy Series (Read 129958 times)